Financing infrastructure with private participation is essential to bridging the global investment gap, estimated at US$18 trillion between 2016 and 2040 according to the G20’s Global Infrastructure Outlook. Infrastructure investment is foundational to economic development, improving productivity, stimulating growth, and enhancing quality of life. Yet mobilizing resources for such long-term, capital-intensive ventures demands a nuanced understanding of financial instruments, investor behavior, and public-private risk allocation strategies.
In 2023, the World Bank’s Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) data showed that infrastructure financing was composed of 25% equity and 75% debt. Within equity, public equity dominated with 24%, while private equity played a minimal role at just 1%. International debt financed 40% of total infrastructure investment, equally split between development financial institutions (DFIs) and commercial lenders. Local debt provided 35% of the financing, primarily from commercial lenders. This financial landscape highlights the dominance of private capital (67%) and DFIs (20%) over direct public sources (13%), underlining the importance of crowding in private finance for infrastructure development.
Commercial bank loans remain the principal financing tool, accounting for 43.4% of total infrastructure finance from 2020–2024. Bonds followed at 38%, with equity and development finance contributing 13.06% and 5.54% respectively. The capital structure varies by financing purpose: additional facilities and mergers and acquisitions together represented over 60% of global infrastructure finance, while primary financing and refinancing accounted for the rest. These trends emphasize the need to align funding models with project-specific risks, life cycles, and return expectations.
A strategic financing decision requires assessing a project’s economic viability, financial viability, and bankability. If a project is financially viable and bankable, it can access project finance mechanisms, including direct claims on project revenues via loans or infrastructure bonds. If viable but not bankable, borrowing must rely on a sponsor’s balance sheet, such as a state-owned enterprise (SOE). Projects that are not viable must be financed through government guarantees or concessional instruments from DFIs, possibly with blended finance structures that mitigate risks.
Equity, loans, and bonds offer distinct financing profiles. Equity involves relinquishing ownership and is most suited for early-stage, high-growth scenarios. Loans provide flexibility but often require collateral, while bonds—typically unsecured—offer access to larger pools of capital with longer tenors and fixed interest rates. Infrastructure financing often combines these instruments to match project characteristics and investor expectations.
Emerging instruments such as project bonds, securitization bonds, and thematic bonds (green, social, and sustainability-linked) are expanding the financial toolkit. Securitization bonds, for example, diversify risk and appeal to institutional investors, while thematic bonds align capital with development and climate goals, having reached nearly US$950 billion in annual issuance. Blended finance and public-private partnerships (PPPs) further enable the public sector to leverage private investment, particularly in high-risk or low-return environments.
Public sector engagement is vital not only as a co-investor but also as a risk mitigator and market enabler. Through contingent liabilities, viability gap funding, or specialized financial intermediaries, governments can improve the financial ecosystem and ensure long-term sustainability of infrastructure investment. Decision-making frameworks, as outlined in the report, stress the importance of selecting projects based on social returns, resource constraints, and risk-sharing capabilities, all while preserving fiscal prudence.
In conclusion, financing infrastructure is not merely about sourcing capital—it requires designing financially viable, bankable projects, matching them with appropriate instruments, and coordinating public and private stakeholders through structured, strategic engagement. This integrated approach is critical for meeting global infrastructure needs and achieving sustainable economic transformation.
Read full document:
Financing Infrastructure with Private Participation
Dr. Alberto Ortiz, July 2025
